Back to Seedro
Seedro
Progress · Kindling

Curriculum written
by the parent.

A parent types what they want their kid to understand. Kindling builds a program for that one specific child, runs it as a conversation, and reports back with questions to ask at dinner.

Prototype

What it looks like right now

Three screens from the working prototype. Names and details are stand-ins.

A parent types a subject and receives a five-lesson syllabus to edit and approve
The parent writes the curriculumType a subject in your own words. A five-lesson arc comes back, editable and reorderable. Nothing reaches the child until you approve it.
The child session: one question, three directions of thought, and a free answer
The child argues with itOne idea per exchange. The options are directions of thought, not an answer with three decoys, and the child can always answer in their own words.
The parent report: what the child noticed, and questions to ask at dinner
The parent gets it backNot a score. What the child pushed back on, what they said unprompted, and three questions to ask at dinner.
Scope

What was deliberately left out

Streaks Speed scoring Child accounts Stored audio In-app rewards Rewinding a finished checkpoint

Each one was cut, not forgotten. Streaks aim guilt at a child. Scoring speed corrupts the only real signal, because a kid who learns time is measured starts tapping to finish.

Open problem

What isn’t solved yet

Kids are fast at gaming UI patterns. If a child can pick the right answer without understanding the idea, the system isn’t ready. Making fake comprehension impossible is the open problem.

Open to build with

Curriculum design Child development Learning science Teaching, any age Prompt and eval design iOS

Roles are not posted. Work out what is missing and pitch it.

More from Seedro